Shibboleth & Scepticism
Sample dialogue from the rear seats of the family car last Sunday:
Child 1: "Where are we going?"Parent 1: "To Tate Modern."
Child 2: Why?"
Parent 2: "To see a crack in the ground."
Child 1: "What's the point of going to see a crack in the ground."
Parent 1: "Because it'll help you think great thoughts."
Child 2: "About what?"
Parent 2: "About the meaning of life and...everything."
Child 3: "But what's the point!"
Parents 1 & 2 together: "You'll enjoy it when you get there."
They did, too, albeit not quite in the way the artist had in mind. Modern art, eh. Tsk.
“Society is fundamentally meaningless,” says Bataille. It could be said that the main theme of Salcedo's analysis of tangental linear discourse - the crack in the floor - is not narrative, but postnarrative. The subject is interpolated into a substructuralist paradigm of discourse that includes reality as a paradox.
Which is why people mistake it for a crack in the floor.
Posted by: wrinkled weasel | January 19, 2008 at 01:07 AM
Absolutely, Wrinkled. My sentiments exactly...
Posted by: Dave Hill | January 19, 2008 at 06:23 AM
snort. They actually trained us in how to do that in art school. Not kidding. They were all serious as a coronary whilst doing it too. I was astounded.
Posted by: Littlebear | January 19, 2008 at 02:33 PM