With the next edition of the Hackney Gazette expected to report on local opposition to a Tesco Express taking up residence at 144-146 Lower Clapton Road, this might be a good moment to fortify emotion with cold-eyed realism. Like all the fellow residents in the photograph above (taken yesterday), I love the friendliness and individuality of Palm 2 and many of our other local shops. The prospect of any of them being driven out of the business thanks to a branch of the ravenous Tesco giant having the mass buying power to undercut them on price is distressing.
I can understand too peoples' anxieties about what might replace them. Bookmaker or fast food chains or charity shops all have a perfectly legitimate place in my view, but when the range of retailers begins to narrow so that only a few types dominate, a neighbourhood can soon start feeling soulless, shabby and samey with demoralising consequences. Empty units can also end up simply standing empty. It's obvious from the speed at which shopkeepers come and go in Lower Clapton Road that many find it hard to make a living as it is.
Having said all that it should be recognised that holding back the Tesco tide will not be easy, and that one big reason is that not everyone around here wants to. Tesco are not daft: they wouldn't want to set up shop by Clapton Pond if they weren't confident of that a profitable number of customers will welcome them. Even a couple of the campaigners acknowledged to me yesterday that they know of residents, including some who live in Shire Close and Alva Court, who can see advantages in having a Tesco Express on their doorsteps. Why? Convenience, quality, low prices - the very reasons why Tesco has become the business phenomenon that it is.
Then there are the limited powers of the Council to prevent or discourage this happening. They cannot stop the owner of the premises, Family Mosaic, from letting the space to Tesco. Opponents' best hope appears to be persuading the Council to turn down the company's applications for delivery hours to be extended to include late evenings and bank holidays and being allowed to load and unload in front of the building. The latter, would, I'm told, entail consultation with Transport for London, which is responsible for the smooth-running of the red route.
All our ward Councillors echo the campaigners' advice to write individual letters of objection. Details of the permissions being sought can be found here and advice on objecting can be found here. The campaign website also raises a question over whether the procedure for initially encouraging the unit to be used for "affordable office space" before a retailer was sought was properly followed.
No doubt all of these possible means of blocking or at least slowing the progress of the Express will be vigorously pursued by the campaigners. However, Tesco's power and determination is not in doubt. The Council is well aware that the company has a record for not being deterred when local authorities place obstacles in its way, and that a point would very likely be reached when the expense involved in fighting a succession of appeals and challenges would become hard to justify to the council tax-payer. And those for whom fighting the giant is a moral cause would be naive not to recognise the counter argument that Tesco are the business of giving people what they want.
It may be that many of the independent shopkeepers some us so cherish will, in the end, be left with no choice but to compete with a powerful newcomer. Perhaps they should consider ways of working together and more closely with their customers to ensure that they make the best of their individuality and do all they can to keep the prices of some basic goods as low as possible. Some sort of hyper-local marketing campaign might be worth trying too.
But in the end, the answer lies with the local community. The best thing many of us who can afford it could do to help would be to start spending less on those convenient home deliveries from Sainsburys or Waitrose - or whichever supermarket we disaprove of less than Tesco - and begin putting more in our small shopkeepers' tills.
nice article Dave - i think you've touched well on the ambivalence surrounding this issue, which all makes me feel quite uneasy.
as a clapton pond resident i am in no doubt that having a tesco express on my doorstep will improve mine and many other people's lives - for starters not having to pay to withdraw cash or to use a card, and to have very cheap essentials like bread and milk. lets face it, there are a lot of less wealthy people in clapton who need cheap prices more than a chat with the local shopkeeper - this is not stoke newington church street and most people simply cant afford to subsidise local shopkeepers tills just because they are nice, especially in this economic climate.
i also think its slightly middle class and conservative to object to tescos having a presence here - i mean, its just the modern face of consumerism - in 50 years time i am sure people will be banding together to prevent the onslaught of whatever arrives to supercede tesco and we will bemoan a loss of character to our local areas - this small-minded englishness about preserving some villagy (sic) notion of local identity in the face of uncaring modernism is blinkered and unreal.
however, it does seem that, typically of a big corporation, tesco have bulldozered their way in without consulting residents or local shopkeepers who will all suffer from this new arrival in the form of massive undercutting and midnight delieveries, and there's no doubt that palm 2 is a very nice shop that tries its best to please customers and is part odf the community to an extent. these are factors that need to be taken into account and handled delicately and with consultation with the area and its residents not just accepted without objection so its great to see people voicing their objections in this way.
ultimately though, this is london, change and modernisation, even its most brutal, sometimes high-rise and faceless form, is part of the fabric of the city and always has been - i cant help but see the arrival of tesco, if handled correctly, as being in some way an improvement on the area - notting hill, islington, kensington, they all have tescos and they're all still rather nice places to live. Having choice is a great benefit to any resident and Palm 2 could survive by adapting and perhaps becoming something of a coffee shop / cafe as well as a delicatessan like its organic arm across the pond.
Posted by: Andy | May 27, 2010 at 11:57 AM
Dave, well balanced argument. I do think you could have discussed more fully why Tesco seems to provoke this reaction in many people? Perhaps it is something to do with it having reached something of an unchallengeable position, above local authority or even central government . The Guardian certainly got its fingers burnt when it dared to have a closer look.
One has to ask where it is all leading to, and indeed why they are moving into Clapton. Convenience can't be the reason (there being lots of convenience stores here already) and the quality of the basics mentioned by "andy" will not be any different. So it can only be their price advantage they are using (by whatever means that is obtained, whether by extracting every last drop of profit out of farmers or suppliers throughout the world, or by using huge container trucks as part of their store parked outside on red routes) or the "free cash machine" I am very cynical about their motives. Certainly it is nothing to do with giving customers "what they want"
Posted by: plopp | June 02, 2010 at 05:42 AM
" .... can see advantages in having a Tesco Express on their doorsteps. Why? Convenience, quality, low prices - the very reasons why Tesco has become the business phenomenon that it is."
The big Tesco supermarkets might have low prices but the Tesco Express branches most certainly don't. Canny shoppers on the Kingsland Road are returning to local shops, realising that Tesco Express is often much more expensive to shop in.
Posted by: Jane Smith | June 04, 2010 at 08:32 AM
"Jane" (4th June comment) is absolutely right - Tesco Express prices are on average much higher than supermarket prices, no matter what Tesco public relations office would have you believe.
I avoid them like the plaque for that very reason - I've been bitten more than once and have finally learned my lesson.
The main reason prices are higher is simply that their overheads are higher compared to supermarkets - higher rents per square foot and less shelf space. It's also the reason prices vary from one Tesco Express to the next. They do have loss leaders of course, but unless you purchase only those staples or Tesco's cheapest yellow label products (if you can find more than one or two of the range in an Express you'll be lucky) you are likely to pay between 5% and 10% more at an Express than your local corner shop and between 10% and 15% more than the supermarket.
Cigarettes and tobacco at Express stores are up to 15% more expensive!
The other problem with small "Express' outlets is their range is invariable limited due to lack of shelf space so balance out the loss leaders with products that give them the greatest profit margin - so for example you end up with one type of real coffee, 75p more expensive that the Douwe Egberts available at every corner store.
Remember how long then Sainsbury Local lasted at the petrol station near Mt Pleasant Lane on Upper Clapton Road...
Posted by: David White | June 07, 2010 at 08:16 PM
Look at Kingsland Road and Green Lanes how small shops can thrive despite the Tescos they must contend with. It's these varied and colourful shops that actually help to bring out the blandness of the Tesco in their midst.
Can you get the range of fruits, vegetables, spices not to mention the faces and accents in Tesco or the other Expresses? Look at Fresh and Fruity in Stamford Hill. The largest Tesco or Asda doesn't have anything like their range not to mention their prices.
So let Tesco come and stew in their own juice. The Brits may have succumbed to them but the Poles/Turks/Greeks and all the other nationalities round here are made of sterner stuff.
Posted by: IfYouTickleUs | June 08, 2010 at 09:27 PM
Why does it always have to come down to racism?? Its nothing to do with 'Brits' allowing large chains to walk all over us its about having freedom of choice... I come from Devon, full of small villages and in nearly every village there is some form of supermarket chain and the small shops still survive in harmony with these chains and have done for at least 15 years! I think the point everybody has to look at here is that the Tesco Express in Clapton WILL come... It will bring jobs to people who need them... It will bring a new choice to the area, and if the prices are indeed higher than other shops in the area then people will learn very quickly. Take milk as an example... In Tesco supermarkets its 2 for £3 or £1.56 each... I go to the shop half way down Millfields Road and pay £1.30 each... Its about learning where the deals are... I welcome Tesco's because it will bring much needed Jobs to the area and if people are too stupid to make an informed choice thats their problem.
Posted by: Paul Dawe | June 25, 2010 at 09:37 AM
where were you all when the magnificent regal records went bust on Lower Clapton Road? Buying cheap Bob Marley CDs on Amazon or at Tescos(admit it. you do)Tesco? So what? Another food shop.Who sells food is irrelevant and racist. It should be affordable and the consmer can choose. Free range eggs much ceaoer at the Clapton passage supermarket than anywhere. But shops that define Lower Clapton ,like Regal Records? Where is your soul?
Posted by: Zoe B | June 29, 2010 at 09:42 PM
Can someone tell me where on lower Clapton road you can get decent organic meat and GENUINELY fresh fruit and veg (that hasn't been lying around for days)for a decent price. The quality and freshness of such items in the current local businesses is questionable. I work long hours and often dont get a chance to do a decent weeks shop. having the convenience of a Tesco on my doorstep is fantastic. I'm pretty sure the people who are opposing the Tesco will be the first to use the cashpoint and second to buy their crispy fresh salads. I've lived in Clapton for 6 years now and I think this is the best thing that's happened for all the residents.
Posted by: adam | January 15, 2011 at 01:20 PM
My campaign against Tesco in Clapton: I took a quite active role in this campaign for a while, speaking at the first planning committee meeting. What did I learn from it? That there apparently wasn't much the council could do, had it even wanted to, to prevent this shop from opening, as this was mostly a private matter between a housing association and Tesco. I therefore chose the only route which was open to us: object against the main application (allowring deliveries). I did so on the grounds of public safety given that these will be taking place at a bus stop and on a red route. I failed. We failed. I still believe that, had the opposition to the plan been greater, the planning committee wouldn't have created a precedent in lifting delivery restrictions to these premises, thus creating a precedent for many other shops throughout the borough. In the end, we will have an umpteenth Tesco shop opening before yet another one appears on Kingsland Rd: that will make 5 shops between Hoxton and Stamford Hill. What ever happened to the diversity Hackney's mayor wrote about in their manifesto?
Thanks for voicing a diversity of opinions.
Posted by: Pierre L | January 26, 2011 at 03:51 PM
What about the environmental considerations? Ovens to heat "fresh" bakery goods, fridges to cool the salads freezers to freeze the pizzas, electricity to constantly open & close the doors, power the strip lights, all the tills, I am aware that small retailers have similar to a lesser degree but as a housing association tenant myself, I would no more allow my children to sleep above a Tescos than I would stick a mobile phone mast on the roof. I think social housing should be just that, they should consider the health & environment of low income families and put that above grants and corporate bullies.
x
Posted by: Lorna | February 12, 2011 at 01:02 AM