Post a comment
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« The Politics Of Betting Shops (And Other Kinds) | Main | Cuts, Rocks & Hard Places »
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
And to think that during the building works on this site a lovely Georgian shopfront was uncovered under the Victorian one!!! It was promptly skipped. (I'm sure I have the photograph of it on its way to the skip, taken by someone local.) It would have been most unusual (and a lot more attractive) to have a little quaint Georgian-style shop there! Well, c'est la vie! Hackney must be developed, as the doctrine says!
Posted by: Gosia | December 19, 2010 at 11:40 AM
What I object to more is the preposterous building on the left. Hackney council's insistence on fifth-rate Victorian pastiche built to a 1930s building line is historical, cultural and commercial nonsense. In regard to almost every planning approach this fails; it is terrible conservation, it degrades both the integrity of the 1930s corner and the Georgian building is now relegated to a dingy recess. This development perfectly demonstrates why Hackney Planning Office should be cleaned out and restaffed. Clueless!!
Posted by: alex | February 14, 2011 at 07:56 AM
gotta love London
Posted by: Janice Bera | April 23, 2011 at 10:26 AM